課程大綱

課程資訊

課程名稱	環境心理學 Environmental Psychology
開課學期	109-2
授課對象	工學院建築與城鄉研究所
授課教師	畢恆達
課號	BP7039
課程識別碼	544 M3030
班次
學分	3.0
全/半年	半年
必/選修	選修
上課時間	星期二2,3,4(9:10~12:10)
上課地點	工綜313
備註	總人數上限：30人外系人數限制：5人
Ceiba 課程網頁	http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1092BP7039_
課程簡介影片
核心能力關聯	核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述	一、課名：環境心理學二、課程編號：544 M3030（109學年度第二學期）三、學分數：3 四、授課老師：畢恆達 hdbih@.ntu.edu.tw 33665981 http://bihspace.com 五、上課時間及地點：每週二第 234 節（9:10─12:00），工313教室六、課程概要：儘管環境心理學已有五十餘年的歷史，漸漸也與社會/發展/工商/生態心理學等相互滲透，但是在台灣仍然沒有得到太多的重視。台灣的心理學界，認知、實驗、社會等心理學仍然是主流，臨床、組織等位於邊緣，環境心理學則幾乎在心理學系裡找不到課程。至於建築系，環境心理學、建築心理學或者環境行為研究的課程也不多見。環境心理學的用詞與定義分殊，每本教科書隨著其對於科學的界定，而涵蓋不同的理論取向與內容。最簡單而通用的定義是，有關於人的心理經驗/行為與其所處實質/社會/文化環境關係的研究。兩個關鍵字是環境與心理。然則，有的偏重於實體空間，有的含括空間的社會/政經條件；有的偏重外顯可觀察的行為，有的涵蓋抽象的意義層面。有人認為環境心理學是心理學的一個分支（sub-discipline），有人認為它是對於傳統心理學的批判（critique），有人認為是問題導向（problem-oriented）的跨學科研究取向。本課程將探討環境心理學發展的歷史、理論與經驗研究，以及它在環境規劃與設計上的應用。其所涵蓋的領域，可以從四個向度來組織：（1）人：性別、種族、階級、年齡世代、身心能力、遊民、角色（如經理 vs. 工人、醫師/病人/訪客）等。（2）空間：物、住宅、辦公室、購物、公共空間、KTV、醫院、自然、虛擬空間等。（3）心理/社會/文化行為：知覺、認知、壓力、空間行為、災害等。（4）時間與歷史向度（物理時間、發展、歷史）。每一個領域又都涵蓋理論、方法、經驗研究與設計應用。環境心理學的範圍很廣，非一學期的課程所能窮盡。課程的安排，將先介紹其發展的歷史脈絡、基本定義、文獻資源等。接著介紹與環境/行為較為有關的研究方法。然後，討論一些環境心理學的核心概念，以及設計應用。 Moore, G. T., Tuttle, D. P., & Howell, S. C. (1985). Environmental design research directions: Process and prospects. Praeger. Project for Public Spaces https://www.pps.org/ Gieseking, J. J., Mangold, W., Katz, C., Low, S., & Saegert, S. (Eds.). (2014). The people, place, and space reader. Routledge. Bechtel, R. B. (1997). Environment and behavior: An introduction. Sage. Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice (5th ed.). Optimal Books. Kopec, D. (2012). Environmental psychology for design (2nd ed.). Fairchild Books.
課程目標	02/23 課程簡介 03/02 環境心理學歷史與理論 03/09 環境心理學研究方法 03/16 環境認知、尋路Wayfinding 03/23 感官與空間：聲景/氣味地景 03/30 空間行為學（Proxemics，私密性、個人空間、領域感、擁擠、犯罪） 04/06 春假 04/13 環境災害、非自願拆遷（地點認同） 04/20 兒童遊戲場（演講：還我特色公園行動聯盟，特公盟） 04/27 老人與環境 05/04 家的意義（婦女、LGBT、遊民、遭小偷） 05/11 滑板與跑酷（found space與規劃設計的空間、都市治理） 05/18 醫療空間（病人、醫療人員、訪客） 05/25 園藝治療（演講：呂怡安：園藝治療師、臨床心理師） 06/01 POE 與設計準則、社會科學家與建築師如何合作 06/08 總結：疫情之後的環境心理學 06/15 期末報告一 06/22 期末報告二 02/23 課程簡介（環境心理學資源） Moore, G. T., Tuttle, D. P., & Howell, S. C. (1985). Environmental design research directions: Process and prospects. Praeger. (Chap. 4 An organizing framework, pp. 34-40) 03/02 環境心理學理論與歷史甚麼是環境心理學？它在怎樣的社會脈絡與學術自我反省的條件下開始發展？ Altman, I., & Rogoff, B. (1987). World views in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional perspectives. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 7-40). New York: Wiley. Gifford, R. (2014). The nature and scope of environmental psychology. In Environmental psychology: Principles and practice (5th ed.) (pp. 1-20). Colville, WA: Optimal Books. Moser, G., & Uzzell, D. (2003). Environmental Psychology. In T. Millon & M J. Lerner (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology, Volume 5: Personality and social psychology (pp. 419-445). Wiley. Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (2001). Theories of environment-behavior relationships. In Environmental psychology (5th ed.) (pp. 97-135). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College. Nagar, D. (2006). Methodological issues and theoretical perspectives in environmental psychology. In Environmental psychology (pp. 52-93). New Delhi: Concept. Kopec, D. (2012). Foundational theories of environmental psychology. In Environmental psychology for design (2nd ed.) (pp. 17-34). New York: Fairchild Books. Moore, G. T. (1987). Environment and behavior research in North America: History, developments and unresolved issues. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 1359-1410). New York: Wiley. Giuliani, M. V., & Scopelliti, M. (2009). Empirical research in environmental psychology: Past, present, and future. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 375-386. Gu¨nther, H. (2009). The environmental psychology of research. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 358-365. 畢恆達（1989）〈環境心理學研究資料引介〉。《國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報》，4，115-136。 Hansen, W. B., & Altman, I. (1976). Decorating personal places: A descriptive analysis. Environment and Behavior, 8(4), 491-504. 畢恆達（1993）〈物的意義：一個交互論的觀點〉。《國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報》，7，97-110。 03/09 環境心理學研究方法除了一般社會科學的問卷、訪談、觀察、模擬之外，還有環境認知地圖、聲景、拓圖、環境自傳、自我拍照、觀察環境實質軌跡、行為圖示、垃圾研究等 Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry by design: Environment/ Behavior/ Neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning (rev. ed.). Norton.（Chap. 8 Observing physical traces, pp. 159-190；Chap. 9 Observing environmental behavior, pp. 191-226） Adams, P. C. (2018). Methodologies of place attachment research. In J. S. Smith (Ed.). Explorations in place attachment (pp. 227-240). Routledge. Sussman, R. (2016). Observational methods: The first step in science. In R. Gifford (Ed.), Research methods for environmental psychology (pp. 9-27). Wiley. （觀察法） Ng, C. F. (2016). Behavioral mapping and tracking. In R. Gifford (Ed.), Research methods for environmental psychology (pp. 29-51). Wiley. （行為圖示法） Fjørtoft, I., & Kristoffersen, B., & Sageie, J. (2009). Children in schoolyards: Tracking movement patterns and physical activity in schoolyards using global positioning system and heart rate monitoring. Landscape and Urban Planning, 93(3/4), 210-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.008（GPS） Karp, D. A. (1973). Hiding in pornographic bookstores: A reconsideration of the nature of urban anonymity. Urban Life, 1, 427-451.（觀察法） Cosco, N. G., Moore, R. C., & Islam, M. Z. (2010). Behavior mapping: A method for linking preschool physical activity and outdoor design. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 42(3), 513-519. （行為圖示法） Larson, J. S., Bradlow, E., & Fader, P. (2005). An exploratory look at shopping paths. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22, 395-414. （行為圖示法） Marušić, B. G., & Marušić, D. (2012). Behavioural maps and GIS in place evaluation and design. In B. M. Alam (Ed.), Application of geographic information systems (pp. 113-138). InTech. Middlemist, R. D., Knowles, E. S., & Matter, C. F. (1976). Personal space invasions in the lavatory: Suggestive evidence for arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(5), 541-546. (arousal theory、田野實驗法) Baum, A., & Davis, G. E. (1980). Reducing the stress of high-density living: An architectural intervention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(3), 471-481. （田野實驗法） Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2008). The spreading of disorder. Science, 322, 1681-1685. （田野實驗法） Ziller, R. C., Rorer, B., Combs, J., & Lewis, D. (1983). The psychological niche: The auto-photographic study of self-environment interaction. In D. A. Krauss & J. L. Fryrear (Eds.), Phototheraphy in mental health (pp. 95-115). Charles C Thomas.（照片分析） Cooper Marcus, C. (1979). Environmental autobiography. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Institute of Urban and Regional Development Working Paper No. 301.（環境自傳） Haslam, N. (2012). Seat up or down? In Psychology in the bathroom (pp. 136-148). Palgrave Macmillan.（馬桶蓋的效率與公平） Rathje, W. & Murphy, R.（1994）《垃圾之歌》。時報文化。 Winkel, G., & Saegert, S., & Evans, G. W. (2009). An ecological perspective on theory, methods, and analysis in environmental psychology: Advances and challenges. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 318-328. s 3/16 環境認知、尋路一個關鍵性實驗，讓空間認知從行為論轉向認知論。Kevin Lynch的都市意象，則改變了此後都市規劃的思維與表現法。醫院、車站等是分秒必爭的空間，可是基本的找路，仍然是大問題。台大校總區幅員廣闊，近來雖然為校內道路命名，其實真的能夠辨識路名的人不多，那如何指路？校內的指標系統與平面圖又好不好用？ Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental perception and spatial cognition. In Environmental psychology: Principles and practice (5th ed.) (pp. 21-53). Optimal Books. Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (2001). Environmental cognition. In Environmental psychology (5th ed.) (pp. 68-96). Harcourt Brace College. Devlin, A. S. (2012). Environmental perception: Wayfinding and spatial cognition In S. D. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 41-64). Oxford University Press. Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189-208. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. The MIT Press. Lynch, K. (1990). Reconsidering The Image of the City. In T. Banerjee & M. Southworth (Eds.), City sense and city design: Writings and projects of Kevin Lynch (pp. 247-256). The MIT Press. Milgram, S., & Jodelet, D. (1976). Psychological maps of Paris. In H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson & L. G. Rivlin (Eds.), Environmental psychology: People and their physical settings (pp. 104-124). Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Kitchin, R. M. (1994). Cognitive maps: What are they and why study them? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(1), 1-19. Heft, H. (2013). Environment, cognition, and culture: Reconsidering the cognitive map. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33(1), 14-25. Heft, H. (2013). Wayfinding, navigation, and environmental cognition from a naturalist’s stance. In D. Waller & L. Nadel (Eds.), Handbook of spatial cognition (pp. 265-294). The American Psychological Association. All Carpman, J. R., & Grant, M. A. (2002). Wayfinding: A broad view. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 427-442). Wiley. Levine, A. (1982). You-are-here maps: Psychological considerations. Environment and Behavior, 14(2), 221-237. Tati, J. [Director] (1968). Playtime. 片段倫敦地鐵圖 https://www.facebook.com/SmallThingBigIdea/videos/1328242957321729/ 03/23 感官與空間：聲景/氣味地景過去的聲音研究幾乎是研究噪音/壓力，氣味研究都是研究空氣污染，音景/氣味地景則關心正向的營造/策略，以及與人的健康福祉的關係。 Brown, A. L. (2012). A review of progress in soundscapes and an approach to soundscape planning. International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, 17(2), 73-81. Erwine, B. (2017). Creating sensory spaces: The architecture of the invisible. Routledge. Kelman, A. Y. (2010). Rethinking the soundscape: A critical genealogy of a key term in sound studies. Senses & Society, 5(2), 212-234. Coelho, J. L. B. (2016). Approaches to urban soundscape management, planning, and design. In Kang, J., & Schulte-Fortkamp, B. (Eds.), (2016). Soundscape and the built environment (pp. 197-214). CRC Press. Raimbault, M., & Dubois, D. (2005). Urban soundscapes: Experiences and knowledge. Cities, 22(5), 339-350. Lacey, J. (2017). Silencing urban exhalations: A case study of student-led soundscape design interventions. Journal of Sonic Studies, 14(5), 1-15. https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/369404/369473 毛成平（2017）《動靜之間的聲響交會：台灣捷運聲景調查研究》。國立雲林科技大學數位媒體設計系碩士論文。黃潤琳（2016）《坪林聲景的多元詮釋與社會空間建構》。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。 Henshaw, V. (2013). Urban smellscapes: Understanding and designing city smell environments. London Routledge. Cohen, E. (1988). The broken cycle: Smell in a Bangkok soi (Lane). Ethnos, 53(1), 37-49. S´liwa, M., & Riach, K. (2012). Making scents of transition: Smellscapes and the everyday in ‘old’ and ‘new’ urban Poland. Urban Studies, 49(1), 23-41. Schafer, R. M. (1977). The tuning of the world. Knopf. 王俊秀（2001）〈音景的都市表情：雙城記的環境社會學想像〉。《國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報》，10，89-98。李志銘（2013）《單聲道：城市的聲音與記憶》。臺北：聯經。臺灣音聲一百年資料庫 http://audio.nmth.gov.tw/audio 03/30 空間行為學 Proxemics 研究個人空間、領域（性）、私密性（隱私）、擁擠感等之領域。 Gifford, R. (2014). Personal space and territoriality/Crowding and privacy. In Environmental psychology: Principles and practice (5th ed.) (pp. 123-212). Optimal Books. Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Brooks/Cole. Cherulnik, P. D. (1993). Sociopetal space in psychiatric hospitals. In Applications of environment-behavior research (pp. 131-152). Cambridge University Press.（設計應用） Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum,. (2001). Personal space and territoriality. In Environmental psychology (5th ed.) (pp. 251-291). Harcourt Brace College. Costa, M. (2012). Territorial behavior in public settings. Environment and Behavior, 44(5), 713-721. doi:10.1177/0013916511403803（教室座位選擇） Given, L. M., & Leckie, G. J. (2003). ‘‘Sweeping’’ the library: Mapping the social activity space of the public library. Library & Information Science Research, 25(4), 365-385. doi:10.1016/S0740-8188(03)00049-5 Aabø, S., & Audunson, R. (2012). Use of library space and the library as place. Library & Information Science Research, 34(2), 138-149. Hampton, K. N., Livio, O., & Goulet, L. S. (2010). The social life of wireless urban spaces: Internet use, social networks, and the public realm. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 701-722. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01510.x Psathiti, C. & Sailer, K. (2017). A Prospect-refuge approach to seat preference: Environmental psychology and spatial layout. In Heitor, T., Serra, M., Silva, J. P., Bacharel, M., & da Silva, L. C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 137.1-137.16). Instituto Superior Tecnico, Departamentode Engenharia Civil, Arquitetura e Georrecursos, Portugal: Lisbon, Portugal. 04/06 春假 04/13 環境災害、非自願拆遷（地點認同）本週要學習的理論概念是地點依附（place attachment），要討論的經驗案例是康樂里非自願拆遷。課前可以先看紀錄片《我的家在康樂里》，閱讀一篇地點依附、一篇康樂里的論文。 Baum, A., Fleming, R., & Davidson, L. M. (1983). Natural disaster and technological catastrophe. Environment and Behavior, 15(3), 333-354. Di Masso, A., Dixon, J., & Hernández, B. (2017). Place attachment, sense of belonging and the micro-politics of place satisfaction. In G. Fleury-Bahi, E. Pol, & O. Navarro (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research (pp. 85-104). Springer. Fried, M. (1963). Grieving for a lost home. In J. Duhl (Ed.), The urban condition: People and policy in the metropolis (pp. 151-171). Basic Books. Fried, M. (2000). Continuities and discontinuities of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 193-205. Fullilove, M. T. (2014). "The frayed knot": What happens to place attachment in the context of serial forced displacement? In L. C. Manzo & P. Devine-Wright (Eds.), Place attachment: Advances in theory, methods and applications (pp. 141-153). Routledge. Edelstein, M. R. (1988). Contaminated communities: The social and psychological impacts of residential toxic exposure. Westview Press. Edelstein, M. R. (2002). Contamination: The invisible built environment. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 559-588). Wiley. Oliver-Smith, A. (1986). The martyred city: Death and rebirth in the Andes. University of New Mexico Press. 黃孫權（2012）《綠色推土機：九零年代的臺北的違建、公園、自然房地產與制度化地景》。獨立媒體。楊長苓（2003）《銘印、協商與地抗的空間實踐：由康樂里非自願拆遷重思都市規劃與建築歷史》。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所博士論文。欒龍宇（2011）《消失的康樂里：臺北市康樂里拆除後居民生活網絡之研究》。國立臺北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所碩士論文。畢恆達（2000）〈從環境災害過程中探索家的意義：民生別墅與林肯大郡的個案分析〉。《應用心理研究》，8，57-82。參考電影：蘋果的滋味、陳材根和他的鄰居們、我的家在康樂里 04/20 兒童遊戲場（演講：還我特色公園行動聯盟，特公盟）王佳琪、李玉華、還我特色公園行動聯盟（2020）《公園遊戲力》。聯經。 Masiulanis, K., & Cummins, E. (Eds.). (2017). How to grow a playspace: Development and design. Routledge. Hayward, D. G., Rothenberg, M., & Beasley, R. R. (1974). Children's play and urban playground environments: A comparison of traditional, contemporary, and adventure playground types. Environment and Behavior, 6(2), 131-168. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001391657400600201 Weinstein, C. S., & Pinciotti, P. (1988). Changing schoolyard: Intentions, design decisions, and behavioral outcomes. Environment and Behavior, 20(3), 345-371. Moore, R. C., Goltsman, S. M., & Iacofano, D. S. (Eds.). (1992). Play for all guidelines: Planning, design and management of outdoor play settings for all children. Communications. Casey, T. (2007). Environments for outdoor play: A practical guide to making space for children. Paul Chapman. Kozlovsky, R. (2013). The architectures of childhood: Children, modern architecture and reconstruction in postwar England. Ashgate. http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/adventureplayground/ https://www.pinterest.com/betsyroman14/re-using-old-tires-for-playgrounds-/ https://www.facebook.com/taipeibatman/photos/a.139016772899601.28040.139004702900808/216616971806247/?type=1&hc_location=ufi 加一點建築、再加一點小怪獸 https://www.facebook.com/littlemonsterarch/ ambulance playground 歐洲遊戲場5號：鸚鵡遊戲場 http://willlightyear.pixnet.net/blog/post/306026092-歐洲遊戲場５號：鸚鵡遊戲場-legepladsen-skydeban 黎巴嫩兒童的微笑 https://eyesonplace.net/2016/04/01/1792/ Monstrum 公司網站 http://monstrum.dk 三明治工粉絲專頁 https://www.facebook.com/SandwishesStudio/ 04/27 老人與環境 Rowles, G. D. (1978). Prisoners of space? Exploring the geographical experience of older people. Westview Press. Rubinstein, R. L. (1989). The home environments of older people: A description of the psychosocial processes linking person to place. Journal of Gerontology, 44(2), S45–S53. doi:10.1093/geronj/44.2.s45 Iwarsson, S., Wahl, H.-W., Nygren, C., Oswald, F., Sixsmith, A., Sixsmith, J., Széman, Z., & Tomsone, S. (2007). Importance of the home environment for healthy aging: Conceptual and methodological background of the ENABLE-AGE Project. The Gerontologist 47, 78–84. Wahl, H.-W., Iwarsson, S.,& Oswald, F. (2012). Aging well and the environment: Toward an integrative model and research agenda for the future. The Gerontologist 52, 306–316. doi:10.1093/geront/gnr154. Buffel, T., et al (2014). Developing age-friendly cities: Case studies from Brussels and Manchester and implications for policy and practice. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1-2), 52–72. doi:10.1080/08959420.2014.855043 05/04 家的意義（婦女、LGBT、遊民、遭小偷） Valentine, G. (2001). The home. In Social geographies: Space and society (pp. 63-104). Prentice Hall. O’Mahony, L. F. (2012). Meanings of home. In S. J. Smith et al. (Eds.). International encyclopedia of housing and home (vol. 4, pp. 231-239). Elsvier. Kopec, D. (2012). The environment called home. In Environmental psychology for design (2nd ed.) (pp. 175-194). Fairchild Books. Cooper Marcus, C. (1995). House as a mirror of self: Exploring the deeper meaning of home. Conari Press. （家屋，自我的一面鏡子） O'Mahony, L. F. (2013). The meaning of home: From theory to practice. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 5(2), 156-171. Rechavi, T. B. (2009). A room for living: Private and public aspects in the experience of the living room. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 133-143. Gorman-Murray, A. (2008). Masculinity and the home: A critical review and conceptual framework. Australian Geographer, 39(3), 67–379. Scicluna, R. M. (2017). Home and sexuality: The ‘other’ side of the kitchen. Palgrave Macmillan. Korosec-Serfaty, P., & Bolitt, D. (1986). Dwelling and the experience of burglary. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6, 329-344. Chapman, T. (1999). Spoiled home identities: The experience of burglary. In T. Chapman & J. Hockey (Eds.), Ideal homes? Social change and the experience of the home (pp. 133-146). Routledge. Knapp, R. G. & Lo, K.-Y. (Eds.). (2005). House, home, family: Living and being Chinese. University of Hawaii Press. Compton, Jr., R. W., Leung, H. H., & Robles, Y. (Eds.). (2018). Dynamics of community formation: Developing identity and notions of home. Palgrave Macmillan. Young, I. M.（2007）〈房子與家：女性主義主題變奏曲〉。《像女孩那樣丟球》（頁213-272）。商周。 Gilman, C. P.（2011）《黃壁紙》。逗點文創結社。 Lessing, D. （2003）〈十九號房〉。《一封未投郵的情書》（頁49-92）。一方。陳姿瑾（2012）〈自己的房間：當代臺灣女性小說中公寓/家的辯證〉。梅家玲（編）《臺灣研究新視界：青年學者觀點》（頁183-228）。麥田。電影：「時時刻刻」片段 Bachlard, G.（2003）《空間詩學》。張老師文化。 05/11 滑板與跑酷（found space與規劃設計的空間、都市治理） Woolley, H., & Johns, R. (2001). Skateboarding: The city as a playground. Journal of Urban Design, 6(2), 211-230. Nemeth, J. (2006). Conflict, exclusion, relocation: Skateboarding and public space. Journal of Urban Design, 11(3), 297-318. Howell, O. (2005). The "creative class" and the gentrifying city skateboarding in Philadelphia's Love Park. Journal of Architectural Education, 59(2), 2-42. Mould, O. (2009). Parkour, the city, the event. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(4), 738-750. doi:10.1068/d11108 Kidder, J. L. (2013). Parkour, masculinity, and the city. Sociology of Sport Journal, 30(1), 1-23. Kidder, J. L. (2017). Parkour and the city: Risk, masculinity, and meaning in a postmodern sport. Rutgers University Press. 5/18 醫療空間：環境心理學的應用 Willis, H. J., Goad, P., & Logan, C. (2019). Architecture and the modern hospital Nosokomeion to Hygeia. Routledge. Fornara, F., & Andrade, C. C. (2012). Health care environments. In S. D. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 295-315). Oxford University Press. Devlin, A. S., & Andrade, C. C. (2017). Quality of the hospital experience: Impact of the physical environment. In G. Fleury-Bahi, E. Pol, & O. Navarro (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research (pp. 421-440). Springer. Kopec, D. (2012). Health care environments. In Environmental psychology for design (2nd ed.) (pp. 257-276). Fairchild Books. Shumaker, S. A., & Reizenstein, J. E. (1982). Environmental factors affecting inpatient stress in acute care hospitals. In G. W. Evans (Ed.), Environmental stress (pp. 179-223). Cambridge University Press. Sternbert, E. M. (2009). Healing spaces: The science of place and well-being. Harvard University Press. （台大電子書） Adams, A. (2008). Medicine by design: The architect and the modern hospital, 1893–1943. University of Minnesota Press. McCullough, C. S. (Ed.). (2010). Evidence-based design for healthcare facilities. Sigma Theta Tau International.（台大電子書） Elijah-Barnwell, S. A. (2008). Healing through design: Nursing perceptions of the health care environment. The University of Nebraska - Lincoln Educational Studies. Ph.D.: 150. （台大電子書） Brown, L. A. (2013). Contested spaces: Abortion clinics, women's shelters and hospitals: Politicizing the female body. Ashgate Huelat, B. J.（2007）《療癒環境：身心靈的健康照護環境設計》。五南。 The Center for Health Design http://www.healthdesign.org/chd 5/25 園藝治療園藝治療近來也日漸受到重視，它是透過人與植物的互動過程中訓練及修復受傷的身心。園藝工作最大的好處是，它不是一項靜態的工作，在照顧植物的過程中，照顧者會一直感覺到有事情發生：植物發新葉、新芽、花開、花落，生生不息。當感覺到有生命需要自己來照顧的時候，能夠增加對自我的肯定。 Lewis, C. A.（1996/2008）《園藝治療入門》（Green nature/human nature: The meaning of plants in our lives）。洪葉文化。 Louv, R.（2009）《失去山林的孩子：拯救大自然缺失症兒童》。野人文化。黃盛璘（2007）《走進園藝治療的世界》。心靈工坊。 Hartig, T. (1993). Nature experience in transactional perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 25, 17-36. Shukor, S. F. A., Stigsdotte, U. K., & Nilsson, K. (2012). A review of design recommendations for outdoor areas at healthcare facilities. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 22(2), 32-47. Wagenfeld, A. (2009). It's more than seeing green: Exploring the senses through gardening. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 19, 46-52. Cooper Marcus, C. & Sachs, N. A. (2014). Therapeutic landscapes: An evidence-based approach to designing healing gardens and restorative outdoor spaces. Wiley. 06/01 POE 與設計準則、社會科學家與建築師如何合作 Wener, R. E., McCunn, L. J., & Senick, J. (2016). Did that plan work? Post occupancy evaluation. In R. Gifford (Ed.), Research methods for environmental psychology (pp. 249-269). Wiley. Ernst, A., & Wenzel, U. (2014). Bringing environmental psychology into action: Four steps from science to policy. European Psychologist, 19(2), 118-126. Després, C., & Piché, D. (2017). Linking people-environment research and design: What is missing? In G. Fleury-Bahi, E. Pol, & O. Navarro (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research (pp. 65-83). Springer. Lenzholzer, S., Duchhart, I., & van den Brink, A. (2017). The relationship between research and design. In A. van den Brink, D. Bruns, H. Tobi, & S. Bell (Eds.). Research in landscape architecture: Methods and methodology (pp. 54-64). Routledge. Davis, B. E. (2011). Rooftop hospital gardens for physical therapy: A post-occupancy evaluation. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(3), 14-43.（POE使用後評估） 06/08 總結：疫情之後的環境心理學 Devine-Wright, P. et al (2020). “Re-placed” - Reconsidering relationships with place and lessons from a pandemic. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101514 Aragonés, J.-I. & Sevillano, V. (2020). An environmental psychology perspective on the confinement caused by COVID-19. International Journal of Social Psychology, 35(3), 656-663. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2020.1795398 Reese, G. et al (2020). SARS-Cov-2 and environmental protection: Agenda for environmental psychology research. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101444 Meagher, B. & Cheadle, A. D. (2020). Distant from others, but close to home: The relationship between home attachment and mental health during COVID-19. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101516 06/15 期末報告一 06/22 期末報告二
課程要求	修課的同學除了每週撰寫讀書心得（課前）與上課心得（課後）之外，還有兩類作業要求：（1）課堂文獻報告（2）選定一個特定空間（如某公車司機休息室、小福廣場、寶藏巖..）或一種空間（如廁所、公車、捷運標示系統…）進行田野觀察研究，最好能夠運用所學到的環境心理學理論概念，期末時報告研究結果。
預期每週課後學習時數
Office Hours
指定閱讀	待補
參考書目
評量方式 (僅供參考)

課程進度

週次	日期	單元主題
第1週	2/23	課程簡介
第2週	3/02	環境心理學歷史與方法
第3週	3/09	環境心理學方法
第4週	3/16	環境認知與尋路
第5週	3/23	音景、氣味地景
第6週	3/30	空間行為學
第7週	4/06	春假
第8週	4/13	環境災害
第9週	4/20	兒童遊戲場
第10週	4/27	老人與環境
第11週	5/04	家的意義
第12週	5/11	滑板與跑酷
第13週	5/18	醫療空間
第14週	5/25	園藝治療
第15週	6/01	poe與設計準則
第16週	6/08	疫情後的環境心理學